Adelaide urged to eradicate student divide[Newspaper]

FROM: THE AUSTRALIAN WEDNESDAY JANUARY 7 2009

LOCAL and overseas students at the University of Adelaide move in "different worlds" and something must be done urgently to bridge the divide, the universities quality agency has warned.

Adelaide had to do more to sell students on the benefit of interaction, as the attitudes of domestic and international student bodies seemed part of the problem, the Australian Universities Quality Agency says in an audit report.

AUQA praises other aspects of Adelaide's approach to internationalisation, and vice-chancellor James McWha said the agency had pointed to a challenge facing the sector and civic leaders as overseas student numbers rose.

"We are in danger of having two discrete populations of students that don't engage particularly closely with each other," he said yesterday.

Asked about the problematic attitudes of students, he said: "(Often) local students will only engage in events where alcohol is involved and some of the international (student) groups won't involve themselves with that."

Professor McWha said overseas students who arrived 20 to 30 years ago found themselves "welcomed and kind of adopted" by locals such that they could go home knowing "how Australians think and act".

"(But) as the numbers (of overseas students) have grown, that kind of engagement has become less and less (pronounced)."

Adelaide has lately experienced sharp growth in its overseas student body. Most are onshore and concentrated in two faculties. About half are from China, a proportion higher than the sector average.

In 2005 Adelaide considered capping enrolments from certain countries in particular programs, but was advised this would breach anti-discrimination law.

AUQA suggests Adelaide should look at capping enrolments of international students generally in disciplines or faculties where an imbalance in the student body affects the learning experience.

"If we're not careful, we can end up promising an Australian educational experience (yet) importing students into little ghettos of students from their own country," AUQA executive director David Woodhouse said.

Professor McWha said Adelaide hoped to do more recruiting from the Americas, Europe and the Middle East rather than resort to enrolment caps.

Survey results show "high levels" of satisfaction among overseas students at Adelaide, AUQA says. But these students are concerned about lack of work experience in some programs, and language support. AUQA says Adelaide should improve language and other support as it pursues more postgraduate students from overseas.

Although some within the university argue it should lift its English language entry standard to the level demanded by other Group of Eight universities, AUQA says the most important issue is to provide effective language support.

The report says if the university accepts the students, it should ensure they graduate with appropriate English language competence.

Chinese police quiz human rights petitioners(From Newspaper)

FROM: THE AUSTRALIAN (NEWSPAPER) WEDNESDAY JANUARY 7 2009

CHINESE police have begun questioning writers, artists and intellectuals who dared to sign a new charter demanding political reforms.

The move sets the mood for the year in which the Communist Party will mark the 60th anniversary of its rule.

From across China, reports are emerging of officials and even police calling in some of the 303 people who put their names to Charter 08, a document calling for greater civil rights and an end to the political dominance of the Communist Party.

The co-author, literary critic Liu Xiaobo, has been in detention since December 8, the day before the bold manifesto was published online.

Another signatory, a professor of philosophy at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, has written an open letter describing how he was notified by his superiors that the charter was "nonsense" and he should retract his signature. He refused.

Other signatories have been questioned but declined to be identified for fear of reprisals.

One source said: "People are being called in and questioned about who organised the manifesto and whether they had signed in person. We hear that the leaders at the top have decided that they cannot tolerate Charter 08."

The interrogations had been mostly polite, he said. The aim appeared to be to identify the organisers.

Liu, 53, one of four leading intellectuals who joined the student protesters in Tiananmen Square as they demanded greater democracy in 1989, was detained almost a month ago for his role in putting together the manifesto. His wife, Liu Xia, was allowed to visit him on New Year's Day at a secret location outside Beijing.

A source close to the family said: "She was not allowed to see where she was taken and Liu Xiaobo didn't know where he was being held.

"He is being taken care of and is well fed but he undergoes interrogation every day."

The source said Liu, who has spent several years either serving a jail sentence or in detention, was in good spirits but was not allowed access to books, television or newspapers. "He could not tell his wife very much, because the police were present throughout their two-hour meeting and lunch together."

Liu's lawyer, Mo Shaoping, said he was being held under a form of house arrest called residential surveillance but that legal procedure had been violated because Liu had been removed from his home.

Residential surveillance can last for up to six months, and renewal is possible. That means Liu could be held until after thesensitive 20th anniversary of the June 4, 1989, Tiananmen Square protest.

Among the signatories to Charter 08 is the former top party official Bao Tong, who put his name to the document, describing himself as "a citizen".

In an essay written from his Beijing home, he wrote: "Would the powers that be please tell 1.3billion people why freedom is a crime?" Mr Bao was jailed for seven years after the 1989 crackdown and lives under close surveillance.

The Times